I will be posting the original text of my news feature ‘Social media and the future of journalism’, published in the Sunday Essays column of Sun.Star Davao on August 10, 2014. Click here for the Sun.Star article.
Social media and the future of journalism
by Karlo Alexie Puerto; August 9, 2014
“Social media changed the way we look at media and how we access the news.”
These were the words of Ms. Cheche Lazaro, Probe Media Foundation president and investigative journalist during the Mindanao leg of the nationwide Lecture Series in Journalism held at the Finster Auditorium, Ateneo de Davao University sponsored by the Metrobank Foundation.
The media’s primary function is to inform the people about what’s happening around them and in the world in general and the job is primarily done by journalists employed by news companies. With the stride of times, the audiences are not only the spectators of media, but they also have the capacity to even create the news.
Lazaro has specifically pointed out the power social media gives to the people.
“Social media has not only affected our brain, but also the way we communicate,” she said.
After sampling a false situation made up by a social media user, she warned that social media users must be mindful of what they provide to the public.
“Since social media has changed the way we see media, the burden of proof depends on you,” Lazaro added.
During the Spanish occupation, the only source of information was through printed media – from newspapers, pamphlets and magazines. These sources of information was even limited and often filtered to favor the colonizers.
It was during the American Philippines that radio was introduced – which offered a faster way of distributing information. However, most of radio stations that time were dedicated to music and at some point, public service announcements.
With the launch of KZRH (now DZRH), they introduced radio news and soon, nationwide broadcast of their newscasts. After this period, radio become slowly being adopted in the Philippines and born about are nationally syndicated radio stations, regional, local and community radio stations.
After the Japanese occupation and the independence of the Philippines from USA, Filipinos now started to enjoy the benefits of television broadcasting – informing and entertaining with the visuals and the sounds.
As the years passed by, the tri-media has innovated and evolved, introducing new technologies and strategies to bring the most valuable information through the masses. They invested heavily on satellite equipment, cameras, audio recorders, transmitters and even studio setups to go with the growth of Philippine media.
Citizen journalism was introduced in the Philippines on 2007 by ABS-CBN through its program “Boto Mo, I-Patrol Mo!”. The program aims to equip the ordinary cellphone or internet user to be the media’s eyes in situations that they cannot be physically present to cover the story. Other news outfits followed and expanded the use of citizen journalism platforms for additional angles and stories to tell.
Citizen journalism in the Philippines is different from those being launched abroad. In other countries, citizen journalism platforms are separate from large news organizations. The Philippine meanwhile has the exact opposite – these platforms are operated under traditional media organizations.
With the rising number of social media users in the Philippines, traditional news outlets have also joined the bandwagon of being in social media. Television networks, radio stations and even print media outlets have their own Facebook, Twitter or Instagram accounts that link to their main website.
Citizen journalism also has levelled up, with more citizen journalists pitching in stories or shots through these platforms.
Social media was also remarkable because aside from bringing news, it allows more interaction from their target audiences. Social media also has served as a platform for government to interact with the citizens, and for the rescue and retrieval operations immediately after the onslaught of typhoons.
Social media and newsgathering
Second year Mass Communication student Raphil Vince Saguan thought sourcing out news in social media can be advantageous and at the same time risky.
“Sa ngayon, meron nang different social media accounts ang [karamihan], (Now, many had different social media accounts,) knowing that every person can actually be a source of a newsworthy story,” he said.
However, he also believes that journalists should still be there in the newsgathering process involving social media.
“As journalists, kasali sa trabaho yung pagfilter. Dapat alamin ng isang journalist kung totoo ba o hindi yung nakalap na news (It is the journalist’s job to filter [information]. It is his/her responsibility to check whether the information is correct or not),” Saguan notes.
With the availability of new technology and innovation, budding journalists now have other options for newsgathering, even if it has a precaution of filtering its sources.
I will be posting the original text of my news feature ‘Safety in the skies’, published in the Sunday Essays column of Sun.Star Davao on August 2, 2014. Click here for the Sun.Star article.
Safety in the skies
By Karlo Alexie C. Puerto; July 23, 2014
With the loss of both Malaysia Airlines flights MH370 in March, MH17 four months after, Taiwan-based TransAsia Airlines flight GE222 and Air Algerie flight AH5022, people have expressed concern over Philippine airlines and the country’s aviation sector.
However, tracing back historical accounts of Philippine air accidents and hijacking incidents can somehow help skeptics gauge as to the level of safety the country is having now.
After World War II
Air travel picked up in the Philippines slowly after the World War II, after Philippine Airlines (stylized as Philippine Air Lines, Inc.) launched numerous flights using propeller-driven aircraft.
Notable accidents during the era of propeller aircraft include Philippine Air Lines flight S26 that crashed on Mount Baco, Occidental Mindoro on November 23, 1960 in which a case has been filed against the airline.
The airline however lost the case and they were ordered to pay a certain Natividad A. Vda. de Padilla, mother of Nicanor de Padilla, Php 417,000.00 as compensation for her son’s death.
Another notable air accident was the crash of a Douglas C-47 plane at Mount Manunggal in Balamban, Cebu Province on November 23, 1957 which carried Philippine government officials, including then-President Ramon Magsaysay.
The President came from Cebu City for speaking engagements, and was already bound for Nichols Field in Pasay (now the Ninoy Aquino International Airport) when it crashed 22 kilometers northwest of Lahug Airport in Cebu.
The aircraft was owned by the Philippine government, operated by the Philippine Air Force and was assigned as the Presidential Plane.
The turboprop age
The use of more efficient turboprop planes was also introduced to link up local destinations to Manila being the international airport that has significant international connectivity.
Notable accidents concerning turboprop aircraft include those involving two Hawker Siddely HS-748 aircraft owned by Philippine Air Lines.
On February 3, 1975, Philippine Air Lines flight from Manila to Iligan took off at 11:00pm and two minutes after take-off, engine number two went into flames, killing 32 passengers with one lone survivor.
Another instance involving the above mentioned aircraft was a Philippine Air Lines flight PR 206 bound for Baguio from Manila on June 26, 1987 that crashed in Benguet, killing all 50 passengers and crew on board.
The accident was due to zero visibility caused by a monsoon prevailing in the area.
The jet age
It was during the late 80s that airlines start maximizing the use jet airliners in local and international travel, offering more seats, quieter and faster travelling time.
The deregulation of the aviation industry by President Fidel Ramos in 1995 also paved way for the launch of more jet flights from carriers other than PAL.
Jet aircraft however are not spared from aircraft accidents.
On February 2, 1998, Cebu Pacific flight 5J 387 operated using McDonnell DC-9 aircraft departed Manila for Lumbia Airport in Cagayan de Oro City at 09:16am. The pilot decided to make a stop at Tacloban City 09:53am to deliver spare tires for a stalled Cebu Pacific DC-9 aircraft.
While en route to Cagayan de Oro City from Tacloban, the captain was passing through Mount Sumagaya in Claveria, Misamis Oriental on low visibility and when they are about to pass through the mountain range peak, the aircraft hit the peak and it crashed afterwards.
Crisis manager Jesus “Jess” Dureza ruled out that the aircraft was flying 5,000 feet above sea level when the mountain range was actually 6,000 feet above sea level. He also faulted out the map provided by the Air Transportation Office (now Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines) the altitude of the said area at 5,000 feet, misleading the pilot to believe that they are on a safe level.
The ATO however ruled out that the aircraft crashed due to unfamiliar terrain and bad weather, causing the death of 99 passengers and six crew.
Two years after, Air Philippines (now operating as PAL Express) flight 541 departed Manila 5:21am for Davao City on April 9.
Since another aircraft is occupying the runway, the pilot was forced to turn around and wait for the runway to be vacated, unfortunately hitting a coconut tree in Island Garden City of Samal with altitude of 500 feet above sea level. All 124 passengers and six crew members died.
Plane hijacking incidents
For the history of Philippine aviation, there were also numerous attempts of hijacking planes operated by Philippine Airlines, however only a few of them succeeded.
The first air hijack (also termed ‘skyjack’) recorded on Philippine history happened on December 30, 1952 when a Philippine Air Lines flight en route from Laoag City to Aparri, Cagayan as part of the triangular route from Manila to Laoag City, was hijacked by a certain Ang Chio Ko, 23, and commanded the pilot to fly him to Amoy in China.
The co-pilot Captain Felix Gaston, who died June 6 this year at 91, recounted the story with The Philippine Star on 2002, telling that he maneuvered the plane after the hijacker shot Captain Pedro Perlas. He was able to land on Quemoy Island in China, with the assistance of the Nationalist Chinese air force and had the hijacker deported to the Philippines, only to be pardoned by President Carlos P. Garcia
Another incident happened 23 years later, on April 7, 1976. Three members of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) hijacked a Philippine Air Lines BAC 1-11 aircraft bound to Manila from Zamboanga and demanded to be flown to Benghazi, Libya via Manila and be given a ransom of $300,000.
They first landed Manila, demanding that 72 passengers-hostages be replaced with 12 airline executives. Afterwards, they proceeded to Bangkok to refuel, and PAL sent the DC-8, a larger aircraft that can reach Benghazi, and exchanged the hostages for new flight crew. The government also helped them find a country that can accept the hijackers for political asylum.
When they reached Libya April 17, they demanded to be given political asylum or they will blow up the PAL plane. The airline executives later told that the hijackers were given political asylum resulting to the release of the flight crew and the start of their journey back to Manila, however Libya Revolutionary News Service said that Moammar Khadaffy denied giving asylum to the hijackers.
Other aircraft incidents
Aside from aircraft crashes and hijacking incidents, there were also minor aircraft accidents that caused inconvenience to the passengers and the flying public.
Cebu Pacific flight 5J 971 was about to land on the runway of Francisco Bangoy International Airport in Davao City on the evening of June 2, 2013 however it skidded off the runway due to bad weather.
The aircraft got substantial damage after skidding the runway, putting at risk lives of 165 passengers.
While there were no casualties, passengers felt that the airline crew were ‘incompetent’ and ‘unprofessional’ in dealing with the incident.
The airport also closed operations because the Cebu Pacific plane has been blocking the sole runway the airport has, diverting Cebu Pacific, Philippine Airlines and PAL Express flights to nearby General Santos City and cancelling Zest Air flights and AirAsia Philippines flights altogether.
The aircraft, with registration RP-C3266 was removed from the runway three days after the incident.
Renz Bulseco, an air traffic controller based in Tacloban City Airport, said that flying within the Philippine airspace is harmless.
“A lot of planes pass through the Manila Flight Information Region (FIR). For example, the flight path of a certain flight from Hong Kong to Sydney, Australia will pass through Manila, Mactan-Cebu, Cagayan de Oro, and Davao City at an altitude of, say… 36,000 feet above mean sea level,” Bulseco explained.
He also dismissed fears of a similar incident to Malaysia Airlines MH370 losing contact with the air traffic control center as the airspace is well-covered with necessary communication equipment.
“Beyond the Manila Area Control Center (with 200 nautical mile range), flights are monitored through flight progress strips. [Pilots] continuously report their distance, the reporting points they had passed, and that procedure continues until the flights are handed over to the adjacent FIR [leaving our airspace],” he added.
In a blog post, Bulseco detailed the process of a successful departure: first, the pilot requests a Clearance Delivery from the air traffic control (ATC) and ATC supplies pilots with flight path instructions, including flight levels and radar identification code, called ‘squawk’. Second, pilots are to switch radio frequency to the Ground Control for additional instructions pertaining to the assigned runway and taxi (on-ground navigation with own power) instructions. Third, pilots are to switch another frequency to the Tower, which shall give clearance for take-off (which they will also make sure that the assigned flight path is not prone to collision). Next, they are being guided by the Approach (with 60 nautical miles horizontal and 1,500 feet to 15,000 feet vertical range) to their assigned flight levels (based on its height). Lastly, the Area Control Center (ACC) keeps track of the flights that maintain their assigned flight level throughout the Philippine airspace.
Certain flight regions in the country, those near airports, may restrict or regulate flights depending on the situation on the ground, such as weather.
“There are some airports that are equipped with instruments that allows planes to land and take-off even at low visibility, or bad weather, like Manila, Mactan-Cebu, Davao, and other international airports of the country. There are some airports, like Caticlan (Boracay), and Busuanga that only operate from sunrise to sunset,” he elaborated.
Still the ‘safest’ way to travel
Bulseco, also being a frequent traveller himself, believes that flying is still the safest and the fastest way to travel not only around the country, but around the globe.
“I believe you’ll be more likely killed by road accidents than a plane crash,” he noted.
Manuel Nierra, a psychology student and an aviation enthusiast, also shares the same reaction.
“I for one would still patronize air travel because air travel has the most access to any corner of the globe,” he added.
Mass communication student Karl Fernan Licayan believes that air travel is the ‘way to go’.
“There might be other modes of transportation to go to places, but planes are the easiest and the cheapest with the right discount,” he noted.
While skeptics are still questioning the security and safety of the country’s aviation section, international agencies such as the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) both certified Philippine aviation industry as safe, with FAA Category 1 status and ICAO Accreditation regained in 2014 after several years of being downgraded.
Whether or not similar tragedies may happen to Philippine carriers or on international carriers on Philippine soil remains a question yet to be answered in time.
(UPDATED 8:17am, August 28) – ‘Makibaka, wag mag-baboy!’
This line was one of the most commonly used yells during the #MillionPeopleMarch today which was held simultaneously around the country, with its center at both Quirino Grandstand and Luneta Park in Manila. I personally wasn’t able to understand the about the pork barrel at first, but I was able to uncover more as I began the search for the truth.
What is the PDAF? Where did it come from?
The Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF), known more as the ‘pork barrel’ takes its roots from the American congress system, and was embraced by the Philippine legislature during the 1930s.
It was appropriated to members of congress since its introduction, and during the Martial Law era, Marcos had complete control over this fund.
During the post-Martial Law era, the 8th Congress placed parameters and guidelines in the use of the pork barrel. In 1989, the Mindanao and Visayas Development Fund were formed with a lump sum (accumulated) amount of PHP 480 million and PHP 240 million, respectively. However, assemblymen from Luzon also wanted to have a budget for their local projects, and this marked the birth of the Countrywide Development Fund (CDF) in 1990. Since then, the CDF was included in the General Appropriations Act (GAA).
During the Estrada administration, the CDF was renamed to its present name PDAF, which provided more safeguards to avoid malversation of funds, including the option to let NGOs implement the projects.
Is it unconstitutional?
No. It is constitutional under the current 1987 Philippine Constitution. Article VI Section 24 provides:
Section 24. All appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills authorizing increase of the public debt, bills of local application, and private bills, shall originate exclusively in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments.
How it is allocated?
The PDAF is a lump sum fund allocated to members of congress – PHP 200 million for members of the upper house and PHP 70 million for members of the lower house. It is included as one item in the yearly budget plan under the General Appropriations Act.
A legislator can have access to the fund by first submitting a proposal letter of sponsoring a project listed in the priority projects determined from the GAA. It is then submitted to the Finance Committee of the house the legislator belongs before being endorsed to the Senate or House speaker, and to the Department of Budget and Management.
DBM checks its compliance with the GAA, and they disburse the requested budget to the implementing agency in a form of a Special Allotment Release Order (SARO). SAROs are more likely a disbursement voucher for checks intended for implementing agencies that will receive the ‘ready-to-cook pork’. Normally, the implementing agency is an executive department of government, like Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) for relief assistance. However, legislators did have the option of having NGOs implement the project, making auditing more complicated.
How it is audited?
Normally, there is no known procedure for the auditing of the expenditures under the PDAF, since the fund’s nature is discretionary and it is appropriated as a lump sum amount. In the beginning of President Aquino’s office in 2010, the Commission on Audit started conducting a special investigation for the projects funded under the PDAF, spearheaded by its Commissioner Grace Pulido-Tan.
The Commission on Audit explained the special auditing process as follows: They check the documents available with DBM, including the project proposals and the SAROs. COA also contacted the different implementing agencies such as Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), DSWD, and other government entities. Also contacted were the different NGOs selected to implement the project.
COA conducted ocular surveys in the project sites, interviews with heads of implementing agencies (including NGOs) and checks of the existence of the NGOs appointed as implementing agencies.
Disclaimer: I may be inaccurate in other parts of this post. Please beep me if you find anything wrong. Thank you!
- #NewPork won’t have new name – Abad (rappler.com)
- Pork barrel stays in 2014 budget, says Abad (newsinfo.inquirer.net)
- Enrile breaks silence, hits DBM, seeks probe to clear his name (newsinfo.inquirer.net)
- The name PDAF is gone but the pork is still there (opinion.inquirer.net)
- ‘Aquino has the greatest pork of all’ – progressive groups (bulatlat.com)
Before I continue with this post, I would like to take this opportunity to greet everyone, Happy Kadayawan and Madayaw Dabaw!
I started going out on the streets during the festivities of the city in the last year’s Kadayawan Festival, and was followed by the Araw ng Dabaw this March. Now that I have a better chance of joining the festivities, let me give a run-down of how I saw this year’s celebration with the theme: “Pagseguro sa Makanunayong Kaayo.“